Re: A LEGAL FUND
Sonntag, 9. August 2009 12:56
@pro-pro
Legal-Fund ? Moneys pooled by volunteering to contribute supporters, while allowing a free ride by ( probably ) majority of ( freeloaders) others who would be first to try benefit while not paying to the fund ? Sort of idealistic idea, is it not ?
The idea is interesting, and worth consideration :
1. who would be in charge of the Fund ?
2. would person in charge be one who would decide which complain be consider of highest, higher and not so high in importance to be pursued in courts ? Assess the rewards, probability of winning the case, not to waste the Fund's moneys ?
3. what qualification, legal expertize would such, in charge of the Fund, person have, a lawyer perhaps, experienced in international, or just German Law ?
4. Would the Fund be used to pay for the services of such a person ? Would this not deplete the fund ? What if the cost of legal service exceeds the moneys in the fund, who would pay the difference, who would be responsible ? The person in charge, who only puts forward and represents the most important 'issues' ? Certainly not the World - wide spread, often secret supporters of the Fund .
5. Would other experts be required, volunteers.or paid, to follow through, and make follow-ups to assure that the hired lawyers do not take advantage and do not drag cases too long, do not write excessive amount of letters/reports...meetings?
6. Who would decide if the wishes of one country, such as Netherlands's are more important than the issues of another country ?
6. what liability insurance would such a person need in case a member would allege the funds were not properly used or abused ?
The idea is interesting but almost sounds like introducing a dancers union to represent dancers against their own association . Not against IDSF since IDSF is a third independent party to which National Dancesport Associations flog for one reason or another.
The recent example from Ontario, Canada shows that willing to organize themselves and united association members have the power to overturn their Association's Board proposals, and indeed propose and vote for the desired changes.
Association members need be less apathetic, and believe more in themselves and their ability to affect and make a change. United members can have their associations accept , through the democratic voting process and accepting majority decision, desired changes.
These changes could be a better representation of dancers needs, whatever it may be, and communicating these needs to IDSF, or the National Members could be forced their membership to even split from IDSF, no matter how much their directors may wish to remain under the obviously protective umbrella of IDSF .
Wake up members, wake up competitors, show little more life, energy and activity, something you always try to show to us on the dance floor, go to your annual meeting and vote for the changes you want. Without your input the hard working volunteering board members may have no idea what you want and just follow their own ideas for your benefit.
This is not a time to be passive, give up, not care , not participate, not give a damn.
If you do not unite, organize and vote, those who are able to organize and unite ( your beloved association's board members will decide for you ).
If that happens do not complain, by your inaction you will have always voted for what Rules and regulations you have.
|